Research group and cooperation between KIT and KHI Florence
The Lise-Meitner Group "Coded Objects" investigates the form of processes and the objects that shape them. The design and dissemination of information determine global politics and economics, but the formal and material implications of "codes" often go unnoticed or uncontrolled - as do the shifts of responsibility in objects and their networks. What would it mean to view coded objects not as stable categories, but as a methodical approach to form-giving operations and the material of design? Coded Objects, understood as a method of refraction, calls into question any belief in "neutral" technology or immaterial bureaucracy. Rather, the investigation of the shaping of values through aesthetic and material means promises uncomfortable frictions and productive affinities that necessarily affect the present.

Magazine and Platform by Teresa Fankhänel

The Architectural Exhibition Review (aer) is a grassroots, self-funded platform that nurtures a long-lost art form: architecture criticism. aer provides a much needed independent public forum for thoughtful discussion—without a subscription, paywall or the need to be in a particular location. This ongoing online and print experiment solicits and collects short-form writing on a global scale. Our authors are curators, scholars, architects, teachers, writers, students (and counting). Our mission is to resurrect a lively culture of critical and engaged dialogue centered around current exhibitions as a primary medium of architectural discourse with profound influence on the way we negotiate the built environment.

The aer is part of an ongoing investigation into curatorial practices and the history and theory of architecture exhibitions. For further insights, see:
Livraisons d’Histoire de l’Architecture (issues 45 & 46) together with Stéphanie Biancalani-Quantin
Read Issue I & Issue II 
 

DFG Scientific Network

The conception of architectural and urban planning as well as of public open spaces such as parks and squares is usually associated with ideas regarding the social, societal, cultural, political and identity effects to be achieved. So far, however, there has been no specification of the actual fields of impact and the research methods and theories that can be used to achieve them. The network Impact Research in Architecture and Urbanism: Interdisciplinary Theories and Methods responds to this clear need to define the concept of the impact of the built environment and brings together knowledge that is scattered across disciplines and focuses on specific fields of impact.

Research project of Lise-Meitner Group “Coded Objects”

In architecture, the construction of disciplinary knowledge has been bound to the making of objects and their processes—be it plans, models, sketches or renderings—and their subsequent preservation: what the archive holds informs the histories that are written. If, for the necessary reconstruction of the discipline, one must question seemingly stable categories, one of them is necessarily the very preservation and construction of a disciplinary idea, and the processes that shape it. The architectural archive, an institution in which for decades or centuries knowledge was collected, documented and preserved in its material forms, is itself defined by spatial negotiation: what can be taken on, what needs to be left out, what has a spot in the shelves or drawers, what is relegated to basements or flea markets. This negotiation, however, stabilizes both objects and their categories. Boxes of unidentifiable, unsorted postcards or Xerox copies are still prone to being discarded to make space in the archive for ‘proper’ architectural archives like models, plans, or sketchbooks—even though they might entail different methods and modes of thinking about and creating architecture. And one can imagine that objects such as textile knits or fragile craftwork have long been sitting uncomfortably between such categories of value assignment or preservation, not least because they defy the expectations of a discipline built in the idea of a sole, male architecture genius. And yet, recent histories have shown how essential precisely the histories of seemingly marginal and non-architectural making and creating are for a more diverse and deeper understanding of architecture and its histories—and, not least, its protagonists: when architecture historians unravel the history of knitted objects, conventional archival methods are no longer sufficient; when art historians write about the crumbling objects rather than monumental heritage, they can begin to construct the architectural legacy of a migrant community; when archivists place found objects next to precious photographs, questions of value can be asked differently. In order to include makers in the histories of objects that were never afforded the space or means to erect monuments or collect files, the Lise Meitner Group’s project embraces fragile objects as a way to understand how disciplinary knowledge has been coded.

Research project of Tom Wilkinson

From the perspective of the 21st century ecological crisis, modernism has often seemed marred by its reliance on wasteful and extractive methods. In many cases this critique is valid; however, there is also a neglected history of modernist engagements with the problem of waste. This project brings together several case studies to examine their significance for designers, writers and artists, contributing to an atlas of modernist waste spaces. These include the figure of the ragpicker, a central metropolitan protagonist in the works of Baudelaire and Manet. Another example are the drains that recur in depictions of city streets in the 1920s, grimy modernist grids that function as interfaces between the miserable subterranean space and the rational daylight space of the street. Also included are Schwitters' Merzbauten and Albers' glass paintings composed of shards from the Weimar landfill, which illustrate the utopian possibility of waste as a building material after the First World War. The permanent and essential presence of servants in villas, without whom these supposed living machines would not have functioned, is examined as an example of the penetration of modernist space by waste space.

Collaborative research project of Teresa Fankhänel with the TUM Architecture Museum and programmer Max Hallinan

With Large Language Models (LLMs) computers have learned to mimic human speech. Unlike in humans such learning only happens with the help of preexisting vast collections of processable data, be it in the form of textual sources, images or videos, that allow an extrapolation of similarities and conventions. Without the millions and now billions of datasets collected by services like Common Crawl or LAION computers would toddle on.
And yet, truly “new” creations can only be based on what already exists. Out of the “noise” arise images that can seem like ghostly apparitions of what we already know. To draw meaning from the vast collections and databases of precedents—to learn—machines employ techniques created by humans. Ordering systems such as tags, lists and comparisons shape an understanding of the world that is inherently governed by the use of language, from metadata to automatically derived alt texts.
This is not new. (Architectural) archives have mulled the nonlinear relationship of datasets to descriptors for millennia. The intelligence of any system, artificial or not, seems to lie right at this intersection, the text-image or text-object pair and its ability to communicate as well as its openness to other interpretations, to accommodate new queries. This research and exhibition project explores the recent history and practice of text-based artificial intelligence.

This is a research collaboration for the exhibition "City in the Cloud – Data on the Ground"
Architekturmuseum der TUM
Oktober 2025

Mathias Joseph Alten, Michigan Pasture with Cows, 1914, Broad Art Museum, MSU, gift of the Alten and Gilleo Families, 99.16

Exhibition by Teresa Fankhänel and Dalina A. Perdomo Álvarez

Farmland: Food, Justice, and Sovereignty is centered around questions of food knowledge, production, scarcity, and consumption against the background of Michigan State University’s 170-year history of agricultural tradition.
Founded in 1855, the Agricultural College of the State of Michigan (now Michigan State University) sought not only to promote practical education in the agricultural arts but to turn the college into a model farm for the entire nation. It was the first institution for the study of agriculture of its kind, preceding its status as the prototype land-grant university. Starting with the nucleus of agriculture—the farm and its changing relationship to the society it serves—the exhibition provides wide-ranging perspectives on key themes associated with equitable access to food: the urban-rural divide, issues of labor, race and immigration, the United States’ history of slavery and its continued protectionist import and export policies as well as modes of consumption centered around the commodification of food infrastructure and access to food. Through community knowledge and art, Farmland tells a story of Indigenous knowledge, institutional research, farming, seeds, crops, and how the way food systems are designed can either hunger or nurture. The show is centered around a widespread network of local community consultants and collaborators—agricultural students, farmers, activists, researchers, and historians. 

Teresa Fankhänel (formerly Associate curator, Broad Art Museum)
Dalina A. Perdomo Álvarez (Assistant curator, Broad Art Museum)
18.1. - 27.7.2025 Eli and Edythe Broad Art Museum at Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI

Research Project of Maryia Rusak

Contemporary architectural practice is impossible to imagine without computers. As we continue to inhabit architecture’s “digital turn,” a wide range of software programs assist in all stages of the building process, from ideation to final touches, inevitably leaving their footprint. Architecture historians and design practitioners have long been concerned with the impact of new technologies on the design process. Cutting-edge MIT experiments with computer programming in the 1950s or avant-garde form-finding of the 1990s with the aid of new software have been thoroughly researched. However, far less attention has been paid to the more mundane type of early architectural programming developed in the 1960s and 1970s, which, as this project argues, is still at the core of most contemporary BIM processes today. Unlike the more visual experiments of the later decades, this programming relied on building specifications and classification systems developed by commercial producers and resulted from years of intra-European standardisation efforts. Although less spectacular, this architectural programming of the 1960s not only aimed to create large-scale intra-European computer infrastructure but represented an architectural equivalent of a political project of a united Europe. 

The project “Designing United Europe” investigates the business and physical infrastructures of the early intra-European architectural programming networks and explores their implications on the process of design and architectural education. Based on archival and secondary literature research, supplemented with interviews, the project will critically engage with new technologies' social and cultural impact. Interested in the largely invisible bureaucratic actors and proto-algorithmic processes, the project fits well within the research of proto-digital processes at the Professorship of Dr Anna-Maria Meister and the overall agenda of the EKUT Institute. 

PhD Project of Hannah Knoop

In December 1982, the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) published a small blue book of 200 pages and 16 sketches. It became one of the most influential guides for the architecture of settlements in emergency situations to this day, the UNHCR Handbook for Emergencies. Founded in 1950, the UNHCR's mandate is to protect the human rights of refugees and stateless persons in accordance with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR). But how does a claim to rights arise from the Declaration (1948) and how does this come about? How is Article 25 (1) of the UDHR and the basic human right to protection spatially defined and respected in an emergency situation? My hypothesis is that the written form of the handbook should be recognized as an act of design. In addition to the United Nations, several Euro-American organizations played a central role in the drafting and dissemination of the Handbook. They attempted to define standards for the design of the human right to shelter. It is time to examine how those seeking protection as a target group have also shaped the context of the handbook.

Research project of Anna-Maria Meister and Mechthild Ebert

If you were to browse through the complete catalog of the saai–one of the largest architecture collections in Germany with the estates of Frei Otto, Egon Eiermann and Günter Behnisch, to name just the best known–you would find works by over 200 offices and architects. They would be sorted by name, referenced by material and medium, size and date, cataloged according to predefined categories and saved for future visitors. You would not find many women, their practices or spaces for or by marginalized groups or diverse practices. Like many institutionalized archives in the Western world, this one speaks to the long-standing conventions of a discipline constructed by so-called canonical figures - and their work. However, the metadata of the archival catalog does not consist of objective, stable categories. This paper is therefore concerned with exploring the power of metadata as a verb: the active use of archival methods and techniques to uncover lost histories and write alternative histories to those that dominate discourse.

Research project of Anna-Maria Meister

Situated between what is conventionally called "architectural history" (monographic histories or building analyses) and the field of the history of technology and science, this project benefits from its disciplinary indeterminacy. By seeing algorithmic thinking as inextricably linked to an aestheticized rationalism, it exposes fundamental aesthetic and epistemic connections between seemingly contradictory historical currents and figures. At the same time, it examines the question of "paper architecture" not as a radical design revolution, but as an (equally radical) formation of bureaucratic administrative measures on standardized sheets of paper. This project is based on the urgency of questioning the overly hasty dichotomy of design and bureaucracy on the one hand, and that of "neutral" technology and ethics on the other. By bringing this history of algorithmic thinking into spatial proximity with architectural practice, we generate productive frictions and affinities, especially with regard to its significance for the present. Algorithmic history as a series of human and creative negotiations is placed here against the background of technical data and programmed objects.